<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evangelicals Upset With Bush Bible Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/</link>
	<description>Government by fools, silliness and unintelligent people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:21:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eremeeff</title>
		<link>http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3894</link>
		<dc:creator>Eremeeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolocracy.com/?p=1930#comment-3894</guid>
		<description>Thanks for article. Everytime like to read you.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for article. Everytime like to read you.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furat</title>
		<link>http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>furat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolocracy.com/?p=1930#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>In Name.

George W. Bush is only of the same religion as Martin Luther King was: they are both realised souls. Just as some of the founding fathers were and as Abraham Lincoln was.

It is not a religion, it is a state of being. A non-religious person might recognise it as &quot;just simply being human&quot;, and a religious person might recognise it as being &quot;one of us&quot;. But it&#039;s none of that and both at the same time.

The Evangelicals were not deceived thinking he was one of them, any less than than thinking Martin Luther King might have been isn&#039;t either. So where&#039;s the catch? They&#039;re both more than just that: See, some people there are who worship the Divine in the Self for the sake of the Divine and the Self, and not for the sake of &#039;special interest&#039;, tradition or a church. It is that kind of worship the Biblical Prophets were referring to and that what was implied in the first commandment - see, there were no other words to put it into. There is none or ever has been a brand for that - a way of being, and an evolved such.


As for his - may he be acknowledged soon - personal agenda, some people might find it a surprise if it turned out Mr Bush never actually followed the neocons and their interests either, but only was complelled to bargon with them in order to persue and act on strictly personal conviction - to rid the world of dictators, while it&#039;s still possible.. And if the neocons can be utilised in the process, why not? Their empires are soon due to crumble and evaporate anyway... Don&#039;t you remember him acknowledging there were explosives in the Towers? Was a gutsy thing, ha?   He did the right thing - to persue acting on conviction. Had he been able to stay in power longer, for sure he would be doing things differently and concentrate more on all that which Obama now will have to instead. Yet another reason not to have waited with it all, as he not did.. Aplause! This was a great historical leader indeed, all the way with folks like Churchill, Ho Chi Minh, Lenin, Atatürk, Gorbachov, Anwar Sadat and others.

Good luck with the economic future, America!
It will eventually turn around, once all the special interest in your country has been finally laid to waste under its own weight and collapsed, hopefully not a day too soon. So there&#039;s your Second Coming/Future Freedom/World Peace, humans...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Name.</p>
<p>George W. Bush is only of the same religion as Martin Luther King was: they are both realised souls. Just as some of the founding fathers were and as Abraham Lincoln was.</p>
<p>It is not a religion, it is a state of being. A non-religious person might recognise it as &#8220;just simply being human&#8221;, and a religious person might recognise it as being &#8220;one of us&#8221;. But it&#8217;s none of that and both at the same time.</p>
<p>The Evangelicals were not deceived thinking he was one of them, any less than than thinking Martin Luther King might have been isn&#8217;t either. So where&#8217;s the catch? They&#8217;re both more than just that: See, some people there are who worship the Divine in the Self for the sake of the Divine and the Self, and not for the sake of &#8217;special interest&#8217;, tradition or a church. It is that kind of worship the Biblical Prophets were referring to and that what was implied in the first commandment &#8211; see, there were no other words to put it into. There is none or ever has been a brand for that &#8211; a way of being, and an evolved such.</p>
<p>As for his &#8211; may he be acknowledged soon &#8211; personal agenda, some people might find it a surprise if it turned out Mr Bush never actually followed the neocons and their interests either, but only was complelled to bargon with them in order to persue and act on strictly personal conviction &#8211; to rid the world of dictators, while it&#8217;s still possible.. And if the neocons can be utilised in the process, why not? Their empires are soon due to crumble and evaporate anyway&#8230; Don&#8217;t you remember him acknowledging there were explosives in the Towers? Was a gutsy thing, ha?   He did the right thing &#8211; to persue acting on conviction. Had he been able to stay in power longer, for sure he would be doing things differently and concentrate more on all that which Obama now will have to instead. Yet another reason not to have waited with it all, as he not did.. Aplause! This was a great historical leader indeed, all the way with folks like Churchill, Ho Chi Minh, Lenin, Atatürk, Gorbachov, Anwar Sadat and others.</p>
<p>Good luck with the economic future, America!<br />
It will eventually turn around, once all the special interest in your country has been finally laid to waste under its own weight and collapsed, hopefully not a day too soon. So there&#8217;s your Second Coming/Future Freedom/World Peace, humans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alek</title>
		<link>http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>Alek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolocracy.com/?p=1930#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>Hi. Good site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Good site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolocracy.com/?p=1930#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that people are basing many comments on unknown factors.  I am what many would call Christian conservative.  However, it is more &quot;liberal&quot; if you will to, for example, be pro-life.  After all, to be pro-life means that one sees hope when others only see despair and poverty.  This is loving liberally.  Many comments here paint Christians in a very negative.  However, as a Christian, I am very blessed to belong to a group that is loving, caring, kind, and thinking.   We adhere to Christ&#039;s messages of loving one another, and following Christ because, in His grace, he forgave our sins and us the ability through Him to follow in a new way.  This way does not include sin.  For this, we are grateful and this is what enables us to love others.  I don&#039;t know where Bush truly stands in his faith, but will pray for both him and especially now our new President (Christ is ultimately who I follow), Barack Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that people are basing many comments on unknown factors.  I am what many would call Christian conservative.  However, it is more &#8220;liberal&#8221; if you will to, for example, be pro-life.  After all, to be pro-life means that one sees hope when others only see despair and poverty.  This is loving liberally.  Many comments here paint Christians in a very negative.  However, as a Christian, I am very blessed to belong to a group that is loving, caring, kind, and thinking.   We adhere to Christ&#8217;s messages of loving one another, and following Christ because, in His grace, he forgave our sins and us the ability through Him to follow in a new way.  This way does not include sin.  For this, we are grateful and this is what enables us to love others.  I don&#8217;t know where Bush truly stands in his faith, but will pray for both him and especially now our new President (Christ is ultimately who I follow), Barack Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athensguy</title>
		<link>http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/evangelicals-upset-with-bush-bible-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>athensguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolocracy.com/?p=1930#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Well, since religion is mental illness, maybe putting followers in mental health facilities would be a little more politically correct than concentration camps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since religion is mental illness, maybe putting followers in mental health facilities would be a little more politically correct than concentration camps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
