http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/mccain-refuses-to-back-palin-in-2012/ Government by fools, silliness and unintelligent people Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:33:26 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/mccain-refuses-to-back-palin-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-1644 » McCain Refuses To Back Palin In 2012 Foolocracy: Government by … Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:07:25 +0000 http://foolocracy.com/?p=2073#comment-1644 [...] » McCain Refuses To Back Palin In 2012 Foolocracy: Government by … I think you’re going to see the governors assume a greater leadership role in our Republican Party.” McCain mentioned Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty and Utah Governor John Huntsman as possibilities. Then the questions got good. … [...] [...] » McCain Refuses To Back Palin In 2012 Foolocracy: Government by … I think you’re going to see the governors assume a greater leadership role in our Republican Party.” McCain mentioned Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty and Utah Governor John Huntsman as possibilities. Then the questions got good. … [...]

]]> http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/mccain-refuses-to-back-palin-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-1641 American Pie Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:26:29 +0000 http://foolocracy.com/?p=2073#comment-1641 If the Republicans are actually thinking of Palin as a contender in 2012, then it shows just how out of touch they really are. One of the reasons, out of thousands, that they did not win this year is because Palin was on the ticket. So...what are they thinking?...Palin in 2012? They realised last month that the American people are not happy with them. The deeply religous and deeply conservative wanted Palin. But that is not very big piece of the voting pie. Not big enough to win an election. So why would they consider Palin in 2012? She was a BIG reason they did not win this election. If they are going to put her name at the top of thier ticket, then why run at all??? If the Republicans are actually thinking of Palin as a contender in 2012, then it shows just how out of touch they really are. One of the reasons, out of thousands, that they did not win this year is because Palin was on the ticket. So…what are they thinking?…Palin in 2012? They realised last month that the American people are not happy with them. The deeply religous and deeply conservative wanted Palin. But that is not very big piece of the voting pie. Not big enough to win an election. So why would they consider Palin in 2012? She was a BIG reason they did not win this election. If they are going to put her name at the top of thier ticket, then why run at all???

]]> http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/mccain-refuses-to-back-palin-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-1640 McCain Refuses To Back Palin In 2012 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:33:56 +0000 http://foolocracy.com/?p=2073#comment-1640 [...] post by WP-AutoBlog Import var AdBrite_Title_Color = '0000FF'; var AdBrite_Text_Color = '000000'; var [...] [...] post by WP-AutoBlog Import var AdBrite_Title_Color = ‘0000FF’; var AdBrite_Text_Color = ‘000000′; var [...]

]]> http://foolocracy.com/2008/12/mccain-refuses-to-back-palin-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-1639 Rachel Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:13:00 +0000 http://foolocracy.com/?p=2073#comment-1639 Why didn't he choose Tim Pawlenty in the first place. I think I'd have more respect for him. He and Sarah were on a Fools Ship to Nowhere. I'm glad he took time to think about it and lick his wounds. He should be gracious to Obama with all the false attacks he made on him. Learned your lesson John? It's not too late to grow up you know. Why didn’t he choose Tim Pawlenty in the first place. I think I’d have more respect for him. He and Sarah were on a Fools Ship to Nowhere. I’m glad he took time to think about it and lick his wounds. He should be gracious to Obama with all the false attacks he made on him. Learned your lesson John? It’s not too late to grow up you know.

]]>