On Inauguration Day Should Obama Party Or Cancel?

Barack Obama’s transition team has found a problem they are not sure how to navigate. Actually, it is his party team that has the problem. The team preparing for the inauguration party is not quite sure how hard to party.

In these troubled times, the party organizers don’t want to look insensitive.

Obama’s inaugural address is likely to emphasize the hard times, maybe even suggest we need to make some sacrifices. Yet the historic nature of Obama’s election needs a full celebration.

What is a political party animal to do?

Obama does have historical precedent to cancel the inaugural ball. Franklin Roosevelt did it in 1933, then again in 1937 and 1941.

That made Roosevelt look good to a country struggling in the Great Depression, but it may not have been much of a sacrifice to Roosevelt anyway.

Tim Blessing, a history and political science professor at Alvernia University in Pennsylvania, said it was questionable whether that was because of tough times “or simply because FDR disliked the balls.”

On the other extreme is Lyndon Johnson’s inauguration in 1965. It was said to have 1.2 million guests. Obama’s inauguration could easily surpass that.

George Bush’s 2005 affair was the most expensive at $40 million. Again, that is an easy target for Obama to pass. Some conservatives are raising complaints that the cost may reach $100 million for this one.

Obama has already announced that lobbyists’ donations will not be accepted, and individual donations will be capped at $50,000. However, that is only a small PR concession on this hugely symbolic matter.

Others say that even in bad times, a one-night party is not out-of-step.

“History teaches us that the party must go on,” said Jim Bendat, Los Angeles-based author of “Democracy’s Big Day: The Inauguration of our President 1789-2009.” “The general feeling seems to be that for one night it’s OK to have a big party.”

A movement is already afoot to make the Obama inauguration the most inclusive in history. Plans are being made for a big celebration along the National Mall. The admission will be free, but the celebration is apt to be ecstatic. Of course, the weather will be about 30 degrees.

In the end, Obama will probably try to achieve both goals: a celebration comparable to his historic election and a reasonable budget.

Placing a celebration on the Mall with no charge will bring out the revelers and exceed Johnson’s 1.2 million. The harder part will be capping the expenses below $40 million. If Obama can keep under Bush’s party expenses, he will look restrained.

In the end, people are going to want to party. That will be partly for Obama’s election, but many will also celebrate that George Bush is going home to Texas. For some, no one can put a price on that.

Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • Fark
  • muti
  • Slashdot
  • ppnow
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • IndianPad
  • NewsVine
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • email
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, U.S. President. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to On Inauguration Day Should Obama Party Or Cancel?

  1. Pingback: » On Inauguration Day Should Obama Party Or Cancel? Foolocracy …

  2. Ted says:

    SCOTUS has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question whether Obama is or is not a “natural born citizen” (as distinguished from “citizen”) three times and counting: First before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors. Other cases on the same question are at, or are heading to, SCOTUS. Whether SCOTUS ultimately decides if Obama is or is not a “natural born citizen” only after the Electors vote, only after Congress acts on the Electors’ vote, prior to Obama’s inauguration, or only after Obama’s inauguration, SCOTUS will have to decide — or the people and/or the military will. The issue no longer is Obama. The issue is SCOTUS.

  3. GetReal says:

    Ted — Obama was born in Hawaii so he is a natural born U.S. citizen period. The Supreme Court has refused to hear these frivolous law suits because they lack factual basis.
    I don’t know if you bring this up because you have some dream of overturning the people’s vote — sorry that will not work.
    Now if McCain had won there would have been a legal question about whether he is a natural born U.S. citizen since he was born in Panama not in the U.S. Since he lost, that legal decision will have to wait until someone else who was not born in the U.S. runs for President and is actually elected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>